Reliving the Epic Moments of the 1991 NBA Playoffs Championship Run
Through the program, local schools will partner with SLU to identify and nominate promising students to receive half-tuition scholarships worth more than $28,000 per year. Applicants will remain eligible for additional scholarships above this level.
I still get chills thinking about the 1991 NBA Playoffs. That championship run wasn't just basketball—it was theater, drama, and raw human emotion playing out on the hardwood. As someone who's studied championship moments across different sports levels, from NCAA to professional leagues, I've always been fascinated by how championship DNA transfers between generations and levels of competition. It reminds me of current players like Cortez, who at just 22 years old carries championship experience from the NCAA and now aims to replicate what his father Mike achieved with the Green Archers—winning that coveted UAAP championship.
The 1991 Chicago Bulls' journey to their first NBA championship represents one of those perfect storms in sports history. Michael Jordan had been knocking on the door for years, facing criticism that he couldn't win the big one. I've always believed that previous playoff failures—particularly the brutal battles against the Detroit Pistons in 1989 and 1990—forged the mental toughness required for that 1991 run. The Bulls finished the regular season with a 61-21 record, second in the Eastern Conference behind my childhood favorites, the Celtics. What made that team special wasn't just Jordan's otherworldly talent—though his 31.5 points per game during the playoffs certainly didn't hurt—but how Phil Jackson masterfully blended role players around him.
I distinctly remember watching Game 1 of the Eastern Conference Finals against the Pistons, that same Detroit team that had bullied Chicago out of the playoffs for three consecutive years. The narrative was familiar—Jordan would get his points, but the "Jordan Rules" would wear him down. Except this time, something felt different. Scottie Pippen had evolved into a legitimate second star, averaging 21.6 points and 8.9 rebounds in that series. The supporting cast of Horace Grant, John Paxson, and Bill Cartwright provided exactly what championship teams need—timely contributions when stars face extra attention.
The clinching Game 4 against Detroit remains etched in my memory. The Pistons, in what many considered a classless move, walked off the court with seconds remaining rather than congratulate the Bulls. That moment symbolized a changing of the guard in the Eastern Conference. Detroit's physical dominance was being replaced by Chicago's more finesse-oriented, team-based approach. From my perspective, this transition mirrors what we see in modern basketball—the evolution from brute force to strategic sophistication.
Then came the NBA Finals against the Lakers, a matchup dripping with storyline potential. Magic Johnson's legendary Lakers versus Michael Jordan's ascending Bulls. The Lakers took Game 1 behind Magic's 19 points and 11 assists, and I'll admit—I wondered if experience would trump hunger. But what followed was a masterclass in adjustment. Jordan guarding Magic in Games 2 through 5 changed everything. Chicago's defense held the Lakers to just 86 points in Game 2, with Jordan himself contributing 13 rebounds and 15 assists to complement his 33 points.
The signature moment—the one I still show young players when discussing basketball IQ—came in Game 5 with the series tied 2-2. With seconds remaining and the Lakers threatening, Jordan drove baseline, drew multiple defenders, and kicked to John Paxson for the championship-clinching three-pointer. That play embodied everything about championship basketball—selflessness, trust, and executing under pressure. The Bulls won 108-101, capturing their first title with Jordan earning Finals MVP honors after averaging 31.2 points, 6.6 rebounds, and 11.4 assists throughout the series.
Looking back, what strikes me most about that 1991 run is how it established a blueprint for championship teams that followed. The gradual improvement through playoff failures, the development of secondary stars, the strategic adjustments between series—these elements remain relevant today. When I see players like Cortez attempting to translate NCAA championship experience to UAAP success, I recognize the same pattern. Championship habits, regardless of level, share common threads—mental resilience, trust in teammates, and the ability to perform when everything's on the line.
The 1991 Bulls didn't just win a championship—they launched a dynasty that would capture six titles in eight years. More importantly, they demonstrated how individual brilliance and team concept could coexist at the highest level. As someone who's both studied and experienced championship environments, I believe that first title is always the most meaningful because it validates the struggle that came before it. The 1991 playoffs weren't just about basketball supremacy—they were about overcoming psychological barriers, and that's a lesson that transcends sports entirely.